Eyy there. I was gonna write an article about Markov matrices (which is almost complete, btw), but then, while scrolling through undergrad contests, I found a really neat solution for a problem at the CIIM from last year. The CIIM is a competition for Latin American undergrad students, similar to IMC, Putnam, Seemous and Traian Lalescu. From what I've seen, the problems are a bit harder than those at IMC, but, then again, my opinion isn't necessarily a very competent one. These are the problems (great for you if you know Spanish).
Today, we shall solve the first one (because you know I like matrices). For those that don't know Spanish, here's what it says:
Problem: Prove that there exists a 2∗2 matrix of order 6 with rational entries, such that the sum of its entries is 2018.
Solution: Let A be a matrix with the required properties. Since A6=I2, we get that (A−I2)(A+I2)(A2+A+I2)(A2−A+I2)=O2. The minimal polynomial of A is, thus, one of those appearing in the decomposition, since A is rational. If A+I2=O2, then the order of A is 2. If A−I2=O2, then the order of A is 1. If A2+A+I2=O2, then A3=I2. Thus, the only possibility is that A2−A+I2=O2, so Tr(A)=1, det(A)=1. Let a,b,c,d be the elements of A, in that order. Thus, we know that a+d=1, and ad−bc=1. By writing d=1−a, we get that a(1−a)−bc=1, so a−a2−bc=1. We want to prove that there exist matrices with these properties such that a+b+c+d=2018, which is equivalent to c=2017−b. Thus, our end goal is proving that a−a2−2017b+b2=1 has rational solutions.
Now, we shall write this as the equation of a hyperbola. 14+a−a2−2017b+b2+20172=54+20172, and, by multiplying by 4, we get that (2b−4034)2−(2a−1)2=5+4∗20172. However, we know that any odd number can be written as a difference of squares (2k+1=(k+1)2−k2, so there exist two real squares for which we get that conclusion. In fact, we can even calculate a and b, but that is left as an exercise for the reader. Since we found that a and b exist, and we found all the rational entries of the matrix according to the rational numbers a and b, we conclude that there is indeed a matrix with the required properties.
As a fun fact, initially, I made a calculation mistake. Instead of writing the equation as a hyperbola, I wrote it as the equation of a circle. Thus, I got that (2b−4034)2+(2a−1)2=5+4∗20172. I do not know whether the above equation has rational solutions, but, while trying to solve it, I remembered of an old problem from Gazeta Matematica 11/2017, proposed by Marian Andronache, which shall be treated as a lemma:
Lemma: Let n be a natural number bigger than 1 with the sum of its divisors not divisible by 4. Prove that n can be written as the sum of two squares.
Proof: We shall use the well-known 'sum of two squares theorem', which states that a number can be written as a sum of two squares if and only if any prime divisor of the form 4k+3 appears in the decomposition at an even power. I won't get into details regarding the solution to this, but you can see a proof of this theorem here: https://www.math.uchicago.edu/~may/VIGRE/VIGRE2008/REUPapers/Bhaskar.pdf
Getting back to the lemma, let us presume by absurd that n can't be written as a sum of two squares. Thus, there is an odd number of apparitions of a prime numberpi of the form 4m+3. We know that the sum the divisors is S(n)=∏w(n)k=1pak+1k−1pk−1, where ak+1 is the power at which a prime number appears in the decomposition. The term from the product associated with pi is equal to 1+pi+p2i+...+paii, and, because ai is odd, we get that the sum is a multiple of 4, which contradicts our choice of n. The sum is a multiple of 4, because p2k is a multiple of 4 plus 1, while p2k+1 is a multiple of 4 plus 3, and we can group the terms together.
I was a bit sad to find out that the above lemma doesn't work on the problem. Indeed, the sum of all divisors of 5+4∗20172 is a multiple of 4. It does, however, work on, for example, 1+4∗20172. I was just 4 units away. The lemma that I wrote has some interesting applications, and I might search for some problems to solve using it for the next articles. Thinking about that, I haven't posted any number theory problem so far. I might post something after I'm done with the Markov matrices article. Tune in next time for some properties of stochastic matrices, or something completely random!
Cris.
No comments:
Post a Comment